The General Court Martial convened by the Defence Headquarters (DHQ) has sparked outrage following allegations of inhumane treatment, denial of fair hearing, and exclusion of family members from proceedings involving detained military officers.
No fewer than 36 officers standing trial over alleged coup-related offences were reportedly brought before the military court in leg chains, with some displaying signs of physical abuse and deteriorating health.
Sources familiar with the proceedings who spoke with Sahara Reporters described the atmosphere as “deeply disturbing,” alleging that several of the accused struggled to stand during sessions due to untreated wounds and prolonged detention.
The proceedings, taking place at the Scorpion Officers’ Mess in Asokoro, Abuja, are being conducted under heavy security, with access restricted to authorised personnel.
Family members of the accused have reportedly been barred from attending, raising concerns about transparency and compliance with constitutional provisions on fair hearing.
The court martial, convened under the Armed Forces Act by Major General A.M. Alechenu, is chaired by Air Vice Marshal H.I. Alhaji and comprises senior officers drawn from the Army, Navy and Air Force.
However, controversy has intensified over claims that some members of the panel had previously been accused by the defendants of involvement in acts of torture during investigations.
“The same individuals accused of supervising or enabling torture are now part of the system determining the fate of these officers. That raises serious questions about justice and impartiality,” a source said.
Charges Yet To Be Disclosed
Although the specific charges were not outlined in the convening order, sources indicated that the case is linked to an alleged coup conspiracy within the armed forces.
Among those standing trial are senior officers, including a brigadier general, colonels, lieutenant colonels and other ranks.
Despite provisions guaranteeing the right to legal representation, concerns have been raised over whether the accused have adequate access to independent counsel of their choice.
Similarly, while medical personnel were assigned to certify the fitness of detainees before each sitting, sources alleged that proper treatment had not been provided.
“The presence of a medical officer means nothing if those in need of treatment are left to deteriorate in chains,” another source said.
Proceedings are being conducted under stringent administrative directives, including mandatory searches of all individuals entering the courtroom, prohibition of electronic devices, and heavy deployment of military and security personnel.
The case has been adjourned to May 12, 2026, as pressure mounts on military authorities to address concerns over due process, humane treatment and transparency.