The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday adjourned judgment in the forfeiture suit filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against 57 properties linked to former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami (SAN), until July 10, 2026.
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik had, on May 26, fixed July 6 for the delivery of the judgement after EFCC’s lawyer, Jibrin Okutepa (SAN), and counsel to Malami and other respondents, Adedayo Adedeji (SAN), adopted their processes and presented their arguments for and against the case.
The case, listed as number four on Monday’s cause list, however, could not proceed.
Although no reason was adduced for the shift in the date, three other cases on the cause list were also given new dates out of the 13 matters before the court.
The anti-graft agency had, in the suit, sought the final forfeiture of the properties for reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.
Moving the motion on the last adjourned date, Okutepa told the court that the motion, filed in February, was supported by a 47-paragraph affidavit with 46 exhibits.
The lawyer, who said the motion was in “three volumes,” prayed the court to grant the application.
EFCC seeks final forfeiture of Malami’s 57 properties
Relying on the processes, he urged the court to hold that Malami and other respondents had “woefully failed to show cause” that the properties “were acquired legitimately.”
He urged the court to order the forfeiture of the properties permanently to the Federal Government.
Responding, Adedeji said the application, filed on 27 February 27 and supported by a 109-paragraph affidavit, was deposed to by Malami.
He said the affidavit was filed to show cause why the final forfeiture order should not be granted.
Adedeji urged the court not only to set aside the earlier interim order, but also to hold that the respondents had demonstrated that the properties “were not acquired from proceeds of crime.”