By Ishaya Ibrahim
The National Welfare Secretary of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Nkemakolam Ukandu, has sued the Chief judge of the Federal High court, John Tsoho, over alleged bias and disobedience to court order.
The National Judicial Council (NJC) was listed as the first respondent in the suit, while Tsoho and Peter Lifu, a judge, are second and third respondents respectively.
In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1165/2026 and filed on Thursday, Ukandu sought an order of the court compelling NJC to investigate allegations of corruption and abuse of judicial powers against Tsoho.
The ADC national welfare secretary said the reassignment of a suit involving the crisis in the party to Lifu by the federal high court chief judge was in disregard to the orders of the supreme court and Emeka Nwite, a judge.
In May, Tosho reassigned a suit challenging the legality of the ADC leadership led by David Mark, to a new judge.
The case, filed by Nafiu Bala, a former deputy national chairman of the party, was transferred to Lifu for adjudication.
Nwite, the former presiding judge of the suit, was among 12 judges recently recommended by the NJC for appointment as justices of the court of appeal.
In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, Bala is seeking to stop Mark, national chairman of the ADC; Rauf Aregbesola, national secretary; and members of the party’s interim national working committee (NWC) from acting as leaders of the party.
The reassignment of the suit came weeks after the Supreme Court directed parties in the dispute to return to the Federal High Court for an accelerated hearing of the matter.
The apex court had, on April 30, set aside a decision of the court of appeal that ordered parties to maintain status quo in the leadership tussle — an order that INEC relied upon in withdrawing recognition of the Mark-led leadership of the ADC.
However, when the matter came up for hearing on May 8 following the apex court’s decision, Luka Haruna, counsel to Bala, informed the court that a letter had been sent to the chief judge requesting that the case be transferred to another judge.
The request was opposed by lawyers representing the ADC, Mark, Aregbesola and Nwosu, who described the move as an attempt at “forum shopping” and argued that it could frustrate the directive for an accelerated hearing.
The defence lawyers also said they had confidence in the impartiality and integrity of Nwite’s court.
Following the disagreement, Nwite adjourned the matter indefinitely pending the receipt of a certified true copy of the supreme court judgment.
According to NAN, Ukandu, in the suit, said the respondents and parties who intend to join the suit opposed the request of Bala’s counsel for the reassignment of the case.
The ADC executive member said Nwite adjourned the matter indefinitely pending the receipt of the certified true copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court.
Ukandu argued that Tsoho reassigned the case to Lifu without complying with the orders of the Supreme Court and Nwite.
He said Lifu went ahead and fixed hearing of the matter for June 3 without considering the judgment of the Supreme Court.
Ukandu claimed that he will not get justice in the case over what he described as alleged ties of Lifu to Nyesom Wike, minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
“The plaintiff believes as his matter, pending before the 3rd defendant’s court in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, affects Nyesom Wike’s interest, he would not get justice,” part of the court document reads.
“The 3rd defendant has consistently disregarded the doctrine of stare decisis which is one of the hallmarks of the judicial system and has displayed clear bias against me.
“Nyesom Wike is the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory in the cabinet of the President of Nigeria and he supports the president’s reelection aspiration.